THERE IS NO EVOLUTION BUT DIRECT CREATION.

THERE IS NO EVOLUTION BUT DIRECT CREATION.

and ALL THE THEORIES OF THE EVOLUTION LIE (WITHOUT EXCEPTION)

————-

FOR ALL LIVING BEINGS:

• Because the first bacteria created by God still live among us without changes, for example, cyanobacteria.

• Because the main living organisms appeared in the Cambrian explosion suddenly and without evolution

• Because the main living organisms appeared in the first era live among us and without evolution (they are called living fossils.)

————-

For human beings

ALL THE FORMS PRESENTED FOR THE EXISTENCE OF HUMAN ANCHORED ARE FAKE (WITHOUT EXCEPTION)

Neanderthal

Provided as evidence.

1856

Extracted from the scientific community.

1960

Piltedowan

Provided as evidence.

1856

Extracted from the scientific community.

1960

zinjanthropus

Provided as evidence.

1959

Extracted from the scientific community.

1960

RAMAPITECO

Provided as evidence.

1964

Extracted from the scientific community.

1979

The forms:

Homo sapiens

Homo Erectus

Homo habilis

Homo Florensiensis

All are human forms that have been forged to deceive the masses.

——————–

Darwin and the evolutionists say that living things seemed incomplete and then evolved over time:

But reality shows living beings that have emerged since the beginning of life on Earth and that have not evolved since their appearance.

Example: the appearance of cyanobacterial bacteria

It is integrated and developed from the beginning of life,

It is able to install calcium carbonate.

And able to build stromalites with oxygen release

It has never evolved and still lives among us in the same way it appeared in the pre-Cambrian era 3.8 billion years ago 3.8 billion years ago

—————-

إضافة الى ذلك ….. Add to that

Five fixed scientific facts that strike the theory of evolution and natural selection in the nucleus and unite its origins and pillars on which it was built and founded:

The first fact …

All skeletons found for some specific human species have not changed, even if they are between a million years old and older. Enough time for significant mutations in genetic traits (according to theory), which is completely incompatible with the theory of evolution that affirms the inevitability of azimuthal mutations in minor periods.

The second fact …

The “supposed” natural evolution of all creatures, as science has now discovered, occurs in a very short and completely non-gradual way. For example, if we go from a Neuenderthal human being (the last human strain that lived the earth before the appearance of modern man) to modern man, we find the “presumed” change in Congenital features occurred completely and quickly in a very short time ( only a few hundred years) and this is contrary to the requirements of the theory of evolution and natural selection and completely contrary to the fact that it requires the existence of intermediate rings between the two successive classes in the election with the need to change slowly (a minimum of hundreds of thousands of years))

The third fact …

There are many animals in nature that now find very old inductors (tens of millions of years), but suddenly and they did not explain the theory that today they are identical inductors and did not know any change, development or mutation despite the passage of this time , which is unacceptable. The theory of evolution does not find a convincing answer.

The fourth made ..

That some of the old man’s human organs, such as muscles, legs and eyes are stronger and one of those of modern humans, how is evolution and natural selection in the opposite direction to the best?

The fifth truth …

The evolution of creatures on Earth (according to the theory of evolution and selection) from the mere cells of the nuclei and above requires the existence of similar developments on the planets currently seen by telescopes, which are thousands, especially those with similar characteristics of the Earth, but the fact that the discovery of extraterrestrial life even in its primitive form is completely zero and there are no signs of its existence, despite the discovery of scientific evidence of the presence of frozen water in the background of some planets and moons, and therefore the theory here remains completely flawed to explain the excellence of the soil in this section